Alchemy, Anthroposophy, Archeosophy, Astrology, Behmenism, Clairvoyance, Esoteric Buddhism, Esoteric Christianity, Esoteric cosmology, Local Esotericism, Freemasonry, Gnosticism, Hermeticism, Kabbalah, Karma, Symbols, Magic and religion, Martinism, Merkabah, Mysticism, Neoplatonism, New Age, Numerology, Obscurantism, Occult, Odic force, Qigong, Planes of existence, Reincarnation, Rosicrucianism, Spirituality, Telepathy, Theosophy
Rupert Sheldrake: Telephone Telepathy
November 13th, 2009 by admin received 25 Comments »
The renowned biologist Rupert Sheldrake presents his recent findings, powerfully suggesting that part of us extends beyond our bod The renowned biologist Rupert Sheldrake presents his recent findings, powerfully suggesting that part of us extends beyond our bodies to make direct connection with the world around us. The presentation includes a video (filmed for television) showing the Nolan sisters.
Related posts:
- Cosmic Telepathy: A How-To telepathy
- Telepathy?
- 10 Steps to Master Telepathy – mind to mind communication
- Lunch 2.0 @ Digital Telepathy
- Telepathy: How to use your powers of ESP
Tags: Rupert, Sheldrake, Telepathy, Telephone
Posted under: Telepathy
I have also had a few premonitions as well but only by a few minutes. The last time was the weirdest l was sat by the phone listening to some music l knew the phone was going to ring l stretched my arm out put my hand on the phone and as l touched it it rang. Now that freaked me out.
I’ve had countless telepathy experiences, i’m a 100 % it’s real. . maybe not in the movie sci fi way, but it’s defenetly real in some form
we little know così the telepathy, creed that the good people in order to make it and to try here to know some of pi
as of 2003, sheldrake had published over one thousand telephone telepathy trials with an average hit rate of >40%. His work in this video is a very small sample of his work. I admit that he needs to refine his methods, but he has done many trials.
I absolutely agree. I can do all that you mentioned. But also you can mentally go inside someones mind and actually walk around. I’ve done it lots of times, and I have had other people do the same and see the exact same things.
hi every one. I just would like to let you know that telepathy does exist. Telepathy is just another way of communicating. You can implement ideas, thoughts and feelings to another human’s mind. You can even implement the feeling of hunger, pain (anything that your body could tell you to feel) etc. . or even cause a person to ridiculously forget if you wanted to, for as long as you connect to their mind. Insects and animals can do the same.
I like when rupert looks straight at the camera at 2:00 or so
i bet he doesn’t really want to be with an 80s band
This è experiment bullshit. every m? somigliava statistical w? RDE to see this.
If we want a result, we are more likely to get, or believe that we have received.
This is exactly what I thought when I watched the video. Just because the probability is 50/50 doesn ', Regehen t Mittelyou', heads, tails, heads, tails break easily. It only means that the coin has an equal chance of being heads or tails up. How often precedes or cross is quite casual. In fact, I 'm sure what this video' s, which seeks to examine.
Dr Rupert I completely agree wid ur researches on telepathy. But what u have found is just bits n pieces. its Like looking for a tiger in d jungle n finding only its nails. In actual practice after extreme meditation u can read anyones thoughts anywhere in the world in a matter of seconds. u can plant ur thoughts on anyone or modify them to ur wish. But everybody cant do it bcoz its d science of God nd a complete surrender to the God is needed. Also first ur mind shud b fully in ur own control
12 ways? à a joke? & quot; I have seen and tested the vaccine, pià ¹ of 1000 times, with 68% of efficiency against randomizzati in double controlled blind placebo with the tests, è be refused.
& quot; And & #39; of 15% pià ¹ of what one expects to us from the possibilità of… This not impressive è, to all, & quot; And & #39; when one repeats many times. C& #39; he was also sottoinsieme a much advanced one. & quot; Not c& #39; è a lot of pià ¹ that us aspetta& quot; It depends if one expects to us & quot; chance& quot; effects & quot; I believe in cerebral waves and merda& quot; You have read Radin, Goswami, Standish, and the studies on correlation EEG? but creed that Sheldrake takes in order to plan their study in order to change a po & #39;.
“fuck off”?
come on dude. . . why so much hostility? We can have a real (and peaceful) conversation and share ideas with each other. . . or you can be insulting. Your call.
fuck off
“so if it continued to land on head only 20% of the time then that wouldn’t be paranormal or wierd. . . ”
did anybody suggest otherwise??
The average success rate in shedrake’s published work is over 40% (with a subset doing much better), not 20%. With chance at 25%, the average of 40% means that chance is not a good explanation.
But I agree with those who argue that Sheldrake needs to do larger trials with more people.
i just flipped a coin ten times in a row and in came up head only twice. maybe if i flipped it another million times the numbers would balance out, but as each flip is an independant event probability has no real baring on the results. so if it continued to land on head only 20% of the time then that wouldn’t be paranormal or wierd. . .
Whoops, I meant 1:3. 8 instead of 1:5. Amplifies my point, though.
There were 12 trials and 4 callers. The odds against getting just exactly 50% of the time is 1:20. The odds against getting exactly the right 25% of the time is 1:5. How to be 1:5 "fucking weird", while 1:20 is not it?
it’s 15% more than what you would expect by chance. . . that’s not impressive at all and it’s not way more than you’d expect. if you actually got it right exactly 25% of the time then that would be fucking weird. this is just stupid retard idiot shit.
i believe in brainwaves and shit but this is just dumb stupd idiot retard shit.
Well. Any is psychical – it does not come to us said as we must grow. Many do not believe in it. Some are pi
They have been in this experiment to little years ago – I have made or two times to the week for approximately 5 months – I had read a precision of 82%, that it amazingly seemed high for me – if you have the book you notice that this experiment constitutes a small part of pià ¹ a wide study of morfica resonance.
Bilbo, I agree that it should have a number of plans have sought to test, but maybe they Pick before 1000. I disagree that it is easier to guess who's calling, as it is to think about some other things, given a limited number of people tend to call every day, some at certain times. But even in this controlled environment, it was only as a likely demand for these people like everyone else, they could not leave the time of day, as an indicator, for example.
There are four sisters who puà ² to call the probabilità & quot; that a conjecture of 1/4 to right not è to the case the result to carry out the calls gibt.20 statistically meaningful, but has repeated this experiment thousands of times, with meaningful result.
Yes your right about that. Maybe I got it from 5:01 where only 3 sisters enters the room.
Still you’ve got to have long test runs to prove anything statistically. Small test series like 10-30 tries can vary a lot from what’s statistically expected.